Led by Alex Nellos, Assoc. AIA, and Alex Solorzano, Assoc. AIA, Session 3 explored contract types and components, contract negotiations, dispute resolution methods, and typical elements of projects that can lead to claims. The foundation for a successful project is a well-written contract and Gerrie Becker, James Lyons, and Kevin Sexton provided a well-rounded group of perspectives on the dos and don’ts of contract negotiation. In addition to the guest speakers, the class viewed case studies of historical events that helped shaped the specific clauses in the AIA contract documents. Participants were also received a code to access three AIAU courses on contracts and business management for additional knowledge and HSW credit.
Understanding local procurement processes, procedures, and standards are paramount to a successful submission and winning bid. Gerrie Becker, Sr. Director and Chief Procurement Officer at Central New Mexico Community College (CNM) offered detail insight into the state procurement process. This included RFQs and RFPs, how local public bodies like CNM are affected by state legislation, capital funds for projects, and advantages of the CMAR method for procurement officials.
In their first presentation, James Lyons (R.J. Dean and Associates) and Kevin Sexton, Esq. (Resnick and Louis, P.C.M.) will be discussing contract components and how these components can be used to leverage negotiations. This presentation helped the participants understand the importance of having well written contracts. The two also shared how professional liability insurance works when faced with a potential claim. In their second presentation, Mr. Lyons and Mr. Sexton explored the best
practices for writing well-crafted e-mails along that align with ethics and law.
Case Study: Unites States vs. Spearin (1918)
The United States vs. Spearin, the oldest construction law case, was a dispute centered on the Brooklyn Old Navy Yard. It involved an existing sewer line that was under the dry dock yard. This case involved the plans and specifications which the owner provided the general contractor. The general contractor was not held liable to the owner for any loss or damages which resulted from insufficiencies or defects in the owner-provided documents to the contractor.
Case Study: Perini Corporation vs. Greate Bay Hotel and Casino (1992)
This case addressed consequential damages related to the former Sands Casino in Atlantic city also called Brighton Atlantic City. The construction manager, Perini, knew and agreed to the substantial completion date and understood the ramifications on why owner needed to have the project completed before the summer months. Perini was ordered to pay $1.5 million in consequential damages to the owner for money loss due to not having the casino fully opened by the agreed upon substantial completion date. It’s important to understand the limit of terms that a contractor and architect can negotiate; a waiver of claims for consequential damages should be looked at not just by contractors, but by architects as well. In 1997, the AIA documents included a clause for consequential damages in the documents (A201-2017, General Conditions and B101-2017, Owner/Architect Agreement).
Case Study: Beacon Residential Community vs. SOM (2014)
At the time architects had a duty of standard of care to only the architect’s client, but the California Supreme Court ruled that this also applied to homeowners associations. The architects were hired by the developers who intended to rent out the units for two years and then sale them as condos. A value engineering decision resulted in deficiencies for the condo owners, who then sued the architects. Although the architect’s contract was with the developer and not the HOA, Beacon HOA referenced product liability law and argued that the condos are like that of a manufacturer. The California Supreme Court found that the architect does have a duty of standard of care to 3rd party homeowners.
















